None
Financial penalty
Reprimand, no fine
9 April 2024
Date on the register
UK GDPR
Law relied on
UK GDPR Article 58(2)(b)
Land or property services
Sector
1 actions on the register
In one line
The ICO issued Clyde Valley Housing Association with a reprimand on 9 April 2024 under the UK General Data Protection Regulation. No financial penalty attaches to it.
01The record
- Organisation named
- Clyde Valley Housing Association
- Action
- Reprimand
- Date published
- 9 April 2024
- Register year
- 2024
- Law relied on
- UK GDPR
- Provisions cited
- UK GDPR Article 58(2)(b)
- Penalty
- None (not a financial penalty)
- Sector on the register
- Land or property services
- ICO register reference
- 17351
- Register status
- Published on the ICO enforcement register, 4 September 2026
- Notice documents
- 2 PDFs published by the ICO
- Sector share of register
- 1 of 216 actions (0%)
- Actions published that year
- 52
- Actions under this law
- 95
- Position on the register
- 139th of 216, oldest first
- Published the same day
- This entry alone
02What happened, and where it sits
Clyde Valley Housing Association received an ICO reprimand on 9 April 2024. The Commissioner acted under the UK General Data Protection Regulation, citing UK GDPR Article 58(2)(b). A formal criticism on the public record. A reprimand carries no fine and no order, but it is published and the ICO expects the shortcomings named in it to be fixed.
No sum is attached to this action. Reprimands are corrective, not financial, which is why Clyde Valley Housing Association appears on the register without a figure beside it.
Clyde Valley Housing Association is filed under Land or property services, which accounts for 1 of the 216 actions on the register (0%). In 2024 the ICO published 52 enforcement actions in total, 18 of them reprimands. 95 actions on the register name UK GDPR.
Counted from the oldest entry forward, this is the 139th of 216 actions on the register and the 1st of 1 in Land or property services. The ICO publishes 2 documents for this action, 108 KB in total: "Clyde Valley Housing Association reprimand" and "Clyde Valley Housing Association reprimand press release". They are the authority for everything on this page.
03The ICO's own account
Clyde Valley Housing Association have received the following reprimand because of an infringement that occurred in July 2022 when they released a new customer portal. This portal included personal data of data subjects and residents found they were able to view personal information such as names and addresses about other residents. A resident reported this to Clyde Valley Housing Association, however this concern was not escalated appropriately which led to data remaining viewable on the portal for a further 5 days until further residents reported the issue and Clyde Valley Housing Association suspended the portal.
The law behind this action
UK GDPR
The UK GDPR is the data protection regime the ICO enforces against controllers and processors. Its upper tier is capped at £17.5 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.
What a reprimand does
A formal criticism on the public record. A reprimand carries no fine and no order, but it is published and the ICO expects the shortcomings named in it to be fixed.
Published notice
04Nearest entries on the register
| Organisation | Date | Action | Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital of Southampton NHS Foundation Trust | 25 Mar 2024 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Dover Harbour Board | 15 Mar 2024 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) | 13 Mar 2024 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| The Central Young Men's Christian Association | 6 Mar 2024 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Chief Constable West Midlands Police | 1 Mar 2024 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
All Land or property services actions/All 2024 actions/The full register
05Work out an exposure of your own
Article 83 fine calculator
Estimate upper and lower tier exposure from turnover and infringement type, on the same scale the ICO works to.
How a fine is calculated
The Article 83(2) factors, the turnover caps, and how a regulator gets from a contravention to a number.
The ICO profile
How the UK regulator works post-Brexit, the £17.5M and £8.7M UK GDPR caps, and its divergence from the EU regime.
Provenance and independence
Source: ICO enforcement register (ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/), as published on 4 September 2026. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
GDPRFine.com is an independent tracker of ICO enforcement. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to the Information Commissioner's Office, and it uses no ICO branding. Where the ICO's own wording is reproduced it is quoted and attributed; everything else on these pages is our own summary of the published record.
The ICO's register held 222 entries on that date. 6 of them are prosecutions of named individuals, with ages and home towns in the ICO's own summary. This tracker indexes organisations, so those 6 are excluded and every count on these pages is out of 216. They remain on the ICO's own register.
An entry says what the Commissioner did on the date shown. It is not a statement about the organisation today, and the ICO can amend or remove a register entry at any time. Amounts and provisions are as published by the ICO; where the published notice does not state a figure or name a provision, these pages say so rather than filling the gap. This entry was read from the register page at https://ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/2024/04/clyde-valley-housing-association/.
Register: ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/. Corrections: [email protected].