None
Financial penalty
Reprimand, no fine
22 September 2022
Date on the register
UK GDPR
Law relied on
provision not named
Local government
Sector
20 actions on the register
In one line
The ICO issued Wakefield Council with a reprimand on 22 September 2022 under the UK General Data Protection Regulation. No financial penalty attaches to it.
01The record
- Organisation named
- Wakefield Council
- Action
- Reprimand
- Date published
- 22 September 2022
- Register year
- 2022
- Law relied on
- UK GDPR
- Provisions cited
- Not named in the published notice
- Penalty
- None (not a financial penalty)
- Sector on the register
- Local government
- ICO register reference
- 17252
- Register status
- Published on the ICO enforcement register, 4 September 2026
- Notice documents
- 1 PDF published by the ICO
- Sector share of register
- 20 of 216 actions (9%)
- Actions published that year
- 32
- Actions under this law
- 95
- Position on the register
- 23rd of 216, oldest first
- Published the same day
- This entry alone
02What happened, and where it sits
Wakefield Council received an ICO reprimand on 22 September 2022. The Commissioner acted under the UK General Data Protection Regulation. A formal criticism on the public record. A reprimand carries no fine and no order, but it is published and the ICO expects the shortcomings named in it to be fixed.
No sum is attached to this action. Reprimands are corrective, not financial, which is why Wakefield Council appears on the register without a figure beside it.
Wakefield Council is filed under Local government, which accounts for 20 of the 216 actions on the register (9%). In 2022 the ICO published 32 enforcement actions in total, 31 of them reprimands. 95 actions on the register name UK GDPR.
Counted from the oldest entry forward, this is the 23rd of 216 actions on the register and the 4th of 20 in Local government. The ICO publishes one document for this action, 266 KB in total: "Wakefield Council Reprimand". It is the authority for everything on this page.
03The ICO's own account
A reprimand was issued after the Council sent papers prepared as a Court bundle, in relation to Child Protection Legal Proceedings, to the parents of the child in question. The Court documents contained a Child Protection Medical Report which included the home address of the mother and her two children.
The law behind this action
UK GDPR
The UK GDPR is the data protection regime the ICO enforces against controllers and processors. Its upper tier is capped at £17.5 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.
What a reprimand does
A formal criticism on the public record. A reprimand carries no fine and no order, but it is published and the ICO expects the shortcomings named in it to be fixed.
Published notice
- PDFWakefield Council Reprimand(266 KB)
04Nearest entries on the register
| Organisation | Date | Action | Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| London Borough of Croydon | 26 Jul 2022 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Plymouth City Council | 28 Apr 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| London Borough of Lewisham | 16 Aug 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Gloucester City Council | 1 Sep 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
| Nottinghamshire County Council | 27 Sep 2023 | Reprimand | UK GDPR | - |
All Local government actions/All 2022 actions/The full register
05Work out an exposure of your own
Article 83 fine calculator
Estimate upper and lower tier exposure from turnover and infringement type, on the same scale the ICO works to.
How a fine is calculated
The Article 83(2) factors, the turnover caps, and how a regulator gets from a contravention to a number.
The ICO profile
How the UK regulator works post-Brexit, the £17.5M and £8.7M UK GDPR caps, and its divergence from the EU regime.
Provenance and independence
Source: ICO enforcement register (ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/), as published on 4 September 2026. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
GDPRFine.com is an independent tracker of ICO enforcement. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to the Information Commissioner's Office, and it uses no ICO branding. Where the ICO's own wording is reproduced it is quoted and attributed; everything else on these pages is our own summary of the published record.
The ICO's register held 222 entries on that date. 6 of them are prosecutions of named individuals, with ages and home towns in the ICO's own summary. This tracker indexes organisations, so those 6 are excluded and every count on these pages is out of 216. They remain on the ICO's own register.
An entry says what the Commissioner did on the date shown. It is not a statement about the organisation today, and the ICO can amend or remove a register entry at any time. Amounts and provisions are as published by the ICO; where the published notice does not state a figure or name a provision, these pages say so rather than filling the gap. This entry was read from the register page at https://ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/2022/09/wakefield-council/.
Register: ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken/enforcement/. Corrections: [email protected].